中德應(yīng)用型高校本科培養(yǎng)方案之比較

——以工業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)專業(yè)為例

打開文本圖片集

中圖分類號(hào)：G642;G649.3/.7 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼：A 文章編號(hào)：2095-6916（2025）16-0134-04

A Comparison of Undergraduate Training Programs Between Chinese and German Applied Universities

—ACase Study of Industrial Design Majors Zhang Xinyuan

（Schoolof Vocational Education，Tianjin Universityof TechnologyandEducation，Tianjin ）

Abstract：Bycomparingundergraduate trainingprogramsforindustrialdesigbetween ChineseandGermanapplieduniversitisacross fouraspects：talent-cultivationgoals，coursestructures，teaching methods，andassssentappoaces，thispaperfindsthatGeran programsemphasize“inovation-driven”learingwithcorecourses，interdiscipinarycolaboration，real-projecttraining，anddiverse assessmentsfocusingonpractic.Incontrast，Chineseprogramshiglight“technicalaplication”，dominatedbytheoreticalrequired courses.Theirpracticalcompoentsfeatureliitedindustrycolaboration，relyontraditionallectures，andusesinglesubjectnt basedonexamsandasigentsAcoringlyitisproposedthatChinseapliedundergauateidustrialdesigneducationatainits engineringeducationstrengthswhiledrawingonGerman experience.Specificmeasuresincludereconstructingan“innovation-driven” trainingobjective，developingacuriculumsystemthatcombinesmodularcourseswitheal-projecttraining，shftingteachingmethods towardscapabilitydevelopment，andimplementingdiverseanddyamicasessmentsThegoalistocultivate“Tshapeddesigers”wo possessbothdeeptechnicalexpertiseandinovationabity，threbyfacilitingthtransfomationandupgradingofindustrldesign education in the new engineering context.

Keywords：industrial design education; applied university； training program；industrial design

《中華人民共和國(guó)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)發(fā)展第十四個(gè)五年規(guī)劃和2035年遠(yuǎn)景目標(biāo)綱要》明確指出，工業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)應(yīng)該以服務(wù)制造業(yè)高質(zhì)量發(fā)展為導(dǎo)向，聚焦提高產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新力，向?qū)I(yè)化和價(jià)值鏈高端延伸[1]

德國(guó)是現(xiàn)代工業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)的發(fā)源地。（剩余4601字）