′</sup> 剖面和18-18'剖面在自重工況和蓄水工況下,均處于“基本穩(wěn)定"狀態(tài),在地震荷載工況下,均處于“欠穩(wěn)定”狀態(tài); 16-16<sup>′</sup> 剖面在道路荷載工況下,處于“不穩(wěn)定"狀態(tài)。采取衡重式擋土墻和樁板式擋土墻2種支護(hù)方案的邊坡整體穩(wěn)定性均滿足規(guī)范要求。結(jié)論綜合考慮經(jīng)濟(jì)性、可行性及現(xiàn)場實(shí)際情況等,樁板式擋土墻靈活性高且抗側(cè)壓能力強(qiáng),但其對地基條件的要求較高,且材料成本和維護(hù)成本較大。相比之下,衡重式擋土墻施工工藝成熟,經(jīng)濟(jì)性和穩(wěn)定性較好,更適用于該工程。-龍?jiān)雌诳W(wǎng)" />

特黄三级爱爱视频|国产1区2区强奸|舌L子伦熟妇aV|日韩美腿激情一区|6月丁香综合久久|一级毛片免费试看|在线黄色电影免费|国产主播自拍一区|99精品热爱视频|亚洲黄色先锋一区

基于瑞典條分法的溝道邊坡穩(wěn)定性及支護(hù)方案研究

  • 打印
  • 收藏
收藏成功


打開文本圖片集

關(guān)鍵詞:邊坡;瑞典條分法;穩(wěn)定性分析;邊坡支護(hù)中圖分類號:TU432 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼:ADOI:10.19968/j.cnki.hnkj.1003-5168.2025.14.012文章編號:1003-5168(2025)14-0062-06

Research on Channel Slope Stability and Support Scheme Based on SwedishSliceMethod

CAO Xueye' BAI Xiaopeng2JI Jiaqiang?

(1.School ofCivilEngineering,Yan'an University,Yan'an716ooo,China;2.StateKeyLaboratory forTunnel Engineering,School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering,China Universityof Mining & Technology(Beijing), Beijing 10o083,China; 3.Capital Construction,Yan'an University,Yan'an 7160o0,China)

Abstract: [Purposes]To evaluate the stability of slopes and optimize eco-friendly support schemes for a gully regulation project in Gansu Province, China,in support of ecological conservation and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin.[Methods] The stability factors for sections 16-16 ' and 18- 18 ' were calculated under four loading conditions (self-weight,reservoir water pressure,seismic excitation,and road load) using both the Swedish slice method and Lizheng Software.Two support options-a counterweight retaining wall and a pile-plate retaining wall—were evaluated for their effectiveness. [Findings] The results of the Swedish slice method aligned with those from Lizheng software.Under selfweight and water storage conditions,all sections achieved "basically stable" status, while they were in an "under-stable" state under seismic load. The 16-16′ section was in an "unstable" state under road load. Both retaining wall types met the code requirements.[Conclusions] Considering economic eficiency,

constructability,and site conditions,the counterweight retaining wall is recommended as the optimal support scheme.While the pile-plate retaining wall offers greater flexibility and stronger lateral resistance, it requires more stringent foundation conditions and incurs higher material and maintenance costs.In comparison,the counterweight retaining wallfeatures mature construction techniques,bettr economic viability,and superior stability,making it more suitable for this project.

Keywords: slope; Swedish slice method; stability analysis; slope support

0 引言

邊坡工程是眾多工程領(lǐng)域中最常涉及的工程形式。(剩余5914字)

目錄
monitor